A few questions of morality....

It is said that nobody is born perfect. I tend to disagree. Don't you think that one can be perfect, although ridden with flaws? It's already a clichez, perfection through imperfection, the logical way to go. But what exactly defines this perfection? What do you think?

Let's say that one requires a certain amount of good and a certain amount of bad to be perfect. Thus we obtain perfect-bad or perfect-good, depending upon the quantity of each. There is no neutral, it would be blasphemy, it would be divine. Alas, we are but humans.

Of course there comes into question what kind of good and what kind of bad? The killer kind of bad cannot be corrected through any kind of good, whereas the idiotically religious good and purity(which I consider false), cannot be corrected through any kind of bad. I'll let you do the math.

It is also said that people are born amongst themselves equal. Yes, I agree!! Equal in rights, equal in the fact that when born, they have no moral values, they do not grasp the concept of money, power, culture, society. In that they are born equal.

Of course it would be discrimination to say that some people are better than others. This is true, yet also untrue. I believe that people who are superior to others are in that way becasue they fight. They fight for what is theirs, but first and foremost they fight for what holds this world together sometimes> Love. A concept as noble in speech as it is in heart, it is the fundamental generator of all that is good and all that is bad, like pity, charity, generosity and on the other hand envy, jeaulosy and hate. Hate is considered to be the antagonistic notion of love, even though it cannot exist without love. The latter must come first, for where there is no love, there is no hate, as hate springs out of love reversed.

These people I believe superior follow their dreams. They challenge life in it's every aspect, twisting and turning it, manipulating it to fit their needs. Only people with higher morale values are able to do so without feeling the repercussions of the rest of the world(Hitler died, Stalin died, Lenin died-all great ones that did bad to the world were punished through the ending of their dream). They fight for theri loved ones, they fight for a relantionship, for their family, for their friends, for social and spiritual accomplishment. They are, therefore, superior to the one's tha don't.

Which of the two are you? A warrior, or a leather and bones bag for a dead soul?


Carpe Diem.